|
debate; Microsoft Vs. Sony
Last post Mon, Aug 11 2008 6:32 PM by Ghix. 10 replies.
-
Thu, Jun 12 2008 10:05 PM
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
Ichigo


- Joined on Sun, Dec 30 2007

- Points 3,031

|
Re: debate; Microsoft Vs. Sony
- If you want graphics more than gameplay I say go for it... - I wouldnt say the Blu - Ray inside some plastic would be considered a " powerful machine " - I can only agree because Gears of War DID SUCK. Thank god the 2nd GoW will be the equivilent of Halo Wars. - FF...I played the game once and I just couldnt follow anything at all. I couldnt name one person ( besides Cloud ) in that game. But, some RPG's tend to be VERY popular on the 360; namely - Elder Scrolls: Oblivion; the graphics and gameplay on this game is almost better than any other game on the 360. also, this was one of the first games for the 360. - that ones more about opinion.... - Neither do I, waste of my time and money.
|
|
-
-
-
Ichigo


- Joined on Sun, Dec 30 2007

- Points 3,031

|
Re: debate; Microsoft Vs. Sony
The ElderScroll games were meant for the PC in the first place. But again, I guess most of enjoying a certain console is about what you enjoy most about it. Gameplay / graphics / or interactivity personally I choose gameplay over graphics everyday which is why I enjoy the xbox 360 more. If you want pure graphics, your a Sony lover. And almost everyone loves interactivity so Wii is great for anyone.
|
|
-
-
-
g33k1337o7



- Joined on Fri, Feb 29 2008
- Laramie, Wyoming, USA

- Points 22,370



|
Re: debate; Microsoft Vs. Sony
joeyc2410:MICROSOFT, because if it was not for microsoft, computers wouldn't be created, which means that the wii or ps3 would have been created, so obviously overall it's microsoft, and console wise... Microsoft, because you can earn achievements and secondly, it's much brighter so you can actually see what you playing. if not for microsoft, computers wouldn't be created?.... firstly, Microsoft doesn't make computers. They are software. Windows is an OS. IBM and Apple are the makers of the first "recognizable" PCs. check here for a list of the first PC's http://www.blinkenlights.com/pc.shtml and Windows is definately not the only OS out there, OSX and any Linux distro work great. I can run most anything that would normally run on windows on ubuntu 8.04.
|
|
-
-
Ichigo


- Joined on Sun, Dec 30 2007

- Points 3,031

|
Re: debate; Microsoft Vs. Sony
Im sorry on my late reply here but my comuter is buggy. anyways...joey...G33k is right you know, and besides that...theres a brightness function on every TV out there lulz.
|
|
-
-
Ghix



- Joined on Tue, Jul 8 2008
- Usa, Minnesota

- Points 785

|
Re: debate; Microsoft Vs. Sony
joeyc2410:MICROSOFT, because if it was not for microsoft, computers wouldn't be created, which means that the wii or ps3 would have been created, so obviously overall it's microsoft, and console wise... Microsoft, because you can earn achievements and secondly, it's much brighter so you can actually see what you playing. Lol that's very funny how you thought microsoft was creator of computers and that i'm ment to say is what
g33k1337o7 sayd lol!
"g33k1337o7"if not for microsoft, computers wouldn't be created?.... firstly,
Microsoft doesn't make computers. They are software. Windows is an OS.
IBM and Apple are the makers of the first "recognizable" PCs. check
here for a list of the first PC's http://www.blinkenlights.com/pc.shtml and
Windows is definately not the only OS out there, OSX and any Linux
distro work great. I can run most anything that would normally run on
windows on ubuntu 8.04."
|
|
Page 1 of 1 (11 items)
|
|
|