in

debate; Microsoft Vs. Sony

Last post Mon, Aug 11 2008 6:32 PM by Ghix. 10 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (11 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • Thu, Jun 12 2008 10:05 PM

    • Ichigo
    • Top 50 Contributor
    • Joined on Sun, Dec 30 2007
    • Rank: Mordos
    • Points 3,031
    • CBTester

    debate; Microsoft Vs. Sony

     I really enjoy spending time working on my arguments on why the Xbox360 console is better than Sony's PS3.  So please give me a good subject, like, graphics, or something of that sort, and beleive me, I will raise hell XD I will try my best to get the better of you in any subject you have to offer. And feedback on how Im doing will be great. Some of you have already heard some of my rants XD.

    • Post Points: 20
  • Fri, Jun 13 2008 12:09 PM In reply to

    • Brice
    • Top 25 Contributor
    • Joined on Thu, Dec 20 2007
    • Rank: Soul Harvester
    • Points 29,046
    • CBTester
      Moderator

    Re: debate; Microsoft Vs. Sony

    I like em both. 

    Vote for Warrior Epic

    • Post Points: 20
  • Fri, Jun 13 2008 9:30 PM In reply to

    • Ichigo
    • Top 50 Contributor
    • Joined on Sun, Dec 30 2007
    • Rank: Mordos
    • Points 3,031
    • CBTester

    Re: debate; Microsoft Vs. Sony

     No problem with that. lol.

    • Post Points: 20
  • Mon, Jun 16 2008 11:18 AM In reply to

    Re: debate; Microsoft Vs. Sony

    If I were to get one of those systems right now I would almost certainly go with a PS3 because...

    • doubles as a BluRay player
    • on paper it appears to be a more powerful machine
    • I would rather have Metal Gear Solid 4 than Gears of War
    • Final Fantasy XIII >  all Xbox360 rpg's combined
    • Halo 3? Bioshock? I'd rather play shooters on a PC but CoD4 and Orange Box will more than suffice on PS3.
    • I don't like sports games.
    But since I'm a nintendo fan boy, PS3 vs 360 is pretty much a non-issue for me. Wink
    • Post Points: 20
  • Mon, Jun 16 2008 4:23 PM In reply to

    • Ichigo
    • Top 50 Contributor
    • Joined on Sun, Dec 30 2007
    • Rank: Mordos
    • Points 3,031
    • CBTester

    Re: debate; Microsoft Vs. Sony

    - If you want graphics more than gameplay I say go for it...

     

    -  I wouldnt say the Blu - Ray inside some plastic would be considered a " powerful machine "

     

     

    -  I can only agree because Gears of War DID SUCK. Thank god the 2nd GoW will be the equivilent of Halo Wars.

     

     

    - FF...I played the game once and I just couldnt follow anything at all. I couldnt name one person ( besides Cloud ) in that game.  But, some RPG's tend to be VERY popular on the 360; namely - Elder Scrolls: Oblivion; the graphics and gameplay on this game is almost better than any other game on the 360. also, this was one of the first games for the 360.

     

     - that ones more about opinion....

     

    - Neither do I, waste of my time and money. 

    • Post Points: 20
  • Mon, Jun 16 2008 4:30 PM In reply to

    • g33k1337o7
    • Top 10 Contributor
      Female
    • Joined on Fri, Feb 29 2008
    • Laramie, Wyoming, USA
    • Devotress
    • Points 22,370
    • CBTester
      Moderator
      Sr. Moderator

    Re: debate; Microsoft Vs. Sony

     Oblivion is way better on PC (as it is with all of the elder scrolls titles in my opinion). FF has many different story lines, as each game is not really a continuation of the last one (besides things like X and X-2) so if you can't follow one, try a different one. The only reason I would buy a PS3 is for FF games. I can't think of a single reason why I would buy a 360, seeing as most games look better on my gaming PC anyways. 

    Wii wins over all. 

    User Image
    • Post Points: 47
  • Tue, Jun 17 2008 8:20 PM In reply to

    • Ichigo
    • Top 50 Contributor
    • Joined on Sun, Dec 30 2007
    • Rank: Mordos
    • Points 3,031
    • CBTester

    Re: debate; Microsoft Vs. Sony

    The ElderScroll games were meant for the PC in the first place. But again, I guess most of enjoying a certain console is about what you enjoy most about it.

     

    Gameplay / graphics / or interactivity

     

    personally I choose gameplay over graphics everyday which is why I enjoy the xbox 360 more. If you want pure graphics, your a Sony lover. And almost everyone loves interactivity so Wii is great for anyone. 

    • Post Points: 5
  • Wed, Jun 18 2008 1:14 AM In reply to

    • joeyc2410
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on Fri, Mar 7 2008
    • Rank: Hell Beetle
    • Points 207
    • CBTester

    Re: debate; Microsoft Vs. Sony

    MICROSOFT, because if it was not for microsoft, computers wouldn't be created, which means that the wii or ps3 would have been created, so obviously overall it's microsoft, and console wise... Microsoft, because you can earn achievements and secondly, it's much brighter so you can actually see what you playing.

    My Name Is Joey,
    I Come Free...WITH AIDS!
    (no offense:P)
    • Post Points: 35
  • Wed, Jun 18 2008 12:45 PM In reply to

    • g33k1337o7
    • Top 10 Contributor
      Female
    • Joined on Fri, Feb 29 2008
    • Laramie, Wyoming, USA
    • Devotress
    • Points 22,370
    • CBTester
      Moderator
      Sr. Moderator

    Re: debate; Microsoft Vs. Sony

    joeyc2410:

    MICROSOFT, because if it was not for microsoft, computers wouldn't be created, which means that the wii or ps3 would have been created, so obviously overall it's microsoft, and console wise... Microsoft, because you can earn achievements and secondly, it's much brighter so you can actually see what you playing.

     

    if not for microsoft, computers wouldn't be created?.... firstly, Microsoft doesn't make computers. They are software. Windows is an OS. IBM and Apple are the makers of the first "recognizable" PCs. check here for a list of the first PC's

    http://www.blinkenlights.com/pc.shtml 

    and Windows is definately not the only OS out there, OSX and any Linux distro work great. I can run most anything that would normally run on windows on ubuntu 8.04. 

    User Image
    • Post Points: 20
  • Mon, Jun 23 2008 12:22 PM In reply to

    • Ichigo
    • Top 50 Contributor
    • Joined on Sun, Dec 30 2007
    • Rank: Mordos
    • Points 3,031
    • CBTester

    Re: debate; Microsoft Vs. Sony

    Im sorry on my late reply here but my comuter is buggy. 

     

    anyways...joey...G33k is right you know, and besides that...theres a brightness function on every TV out there lulz.

    • Post Points: 5
  • Mon, Aug 11 2008 6:32 PM In reply to

    • Ghix
    • Top 200 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on Tue, Jul 8 2008
    • Usa, Minnesota
    • Rank: Razorback
    • Points 785
    • CBTester

    Re: debate; Microsoft Vs. Sony

    joeyc2410:

    MICROSOFT, because if it was not for microsoft, computers wouldn't be created, which means that the wii or ps3 would have been created, so obviously overall it's microsoft, and console wise... Microsoft, because you can earn achievements and secondly, it's much brighter so you can actually see what you playing.

     

    Lol that's very funny how you thought microsoft was creator of computers and that i'm ment to say is what  g33k1337o7 sayd lol!

     

      "g33k1337o7"if not for microsoft, computers wouldn't be created?.... firstly, Microsoft doesn't make computers. They are software. Windows is an OS. IBM and Apple are the makers of the first "recognizable" PCs. check here for a list of the first PC's

    http://www.blinkenlights.com/pc.shtml 

    and Windows is definately not the only OS out there, OSX and any Linux distro work great. I can run most anything that would normally run on windows on ubuntu 8.04."

     


    • Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (11 items)
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems